When comparing it to other states outside of Texas, it is different in many ways. Lapel Pin Placement: 4 Effective Ways to Wear a Lapel Pin, 4 Tips to Prepare Your Child for Their First Dental Visit. Find their verified websites and social media accounts, read past news stories, and learn where they stand on the issues that are important to you. The Texas Judicial system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons. --------------------------------------------------------. At the top of the Texas court system sit two high courts, the Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. Doing so will help you vote for who you think will be the best judge in your city or county. If a Democrat is governor, what happens? WebTexas' Judicial Selection Process. The judicial system has many pros and cons, but i believe that all government officials just want whats best for texas and its citizens. Critics suggest that though States may be unable to fully eliminate politics from the judicial section process, appointment methods see less bias and are better able to mitigate political influences. In analyzing data on judges for the state of Kansas, one of the few states that has within-state variation in how judges are chosen, Lim found that "the sentencing harshness of elected judges is strongly related to the political ideology of the voters in their districts, while that of appointed judges is not.". Judges are supposed to be fair and impartial. They further argue that even if a judge remains impartial, elections create anappearanceof impropriety that damages the public'sperceptionof the judiciary. What you need to know, Beaumont United holds off West Brook in 6A regional, Southeast Texas team takes top prize at 2023 Houston rodeo cookoff, Rare endangered animal seen running across Texas road, It's almost bluebonnet season. Good judges support all of these systems, and good judges hate all of them. Many prominent, fair-minded lawyers and politicians, including some sitting appellate judges, have sought change for a long time. Appointment based systems do a better job than electoral systems of keeping the judiciary from being politicized. 3. Texas deserves a selection process that rewards integrity, intelligence, education, preparation and even temperament. Due to their Non-partisan elections are favored, and voters believe they should have a right to share their opinion about the Judicial branch. Usually, they know little or nothing about these "candidates." In 1988 there were three justices on the ballot each year, on a nine justice court, but because of officials stepping down there were six races for the supreme court on the ballot during this year. Perhaps that biggest problem with electing judges is that not all elections are the same. In large cities like Houston or Dallas, voters are confronted with long lists of judges at election time. Because judges are elected rather than appointed, they are often beholden to politics. Though this system might seem like an efficient way to fill the bench with capable judges, it is actually counter-productive in a state like Texas. I believe that the selection of judges in texas should be reformed. Supporters of tort reform believe that huge jury awards are not only excessive to the injury sustained by the plaintiff but also a void on the states economy and is damaging to certain professions. The general education competencies that i believe applied throughout my essay would be critical thinking and communication. The politics are more difficult, in some ways, than the proposed policy changes. Thanks for the information. In reality, however, that system is broken. Appointing judges further perpetuates that belief. Not all areas elect them, though. Question: 1. Veterans Pension Benefits (Aid & Attendance). His interest in this issueis not new. Judicial Reform: A three-part series. Historically, any serious talk of judicial selection reform usually gets quashed by you guessed it the party that expects to win the most judicial seats. Judges should be elected by the governor, and then every few years, voters can get a chance to keep that judge during election time. Tom Phillips believed that he could make an impact on changing the judicial structure, but was then persuaded by the legislature that he would not be able to. If the people feel that a judge is doing a poor job or is abusing their power, the people have an opportunity to vote in <> /c-@T*?6{/h*aRBYsw\z31Gq8oxr,{S>;Tfy5F>4Wv #e/XmPE86a.#p/l$D12 R3`Z&53P/2h Wh"I"x(R1n`j'.%**=0BMh < EvvYJ'~n 3HJyOy(xFx):;HP 'z64HO. Discuss the pros and cons of electing judges in Texas. The system is not liked by everybody because of the way it selects our judges. Its a grab bag, evidenced whenever a party sweep clears a courthouse full of incumbents, as happened in Harris County in 2018. In a normal election, candidates in the races at the top for president, for governor and the like are usually well known to voters. 5 0 obj I juggle work, the kid's activities, family life, and blogging. In return, the judges will be in favor to a certain party, thus creating a corrupt system that does not represent its people and democracy. Appointments are a more efficient mechanism for selecting judges than elections. For starters, it's hard to understand why a judge from one party would have a different view than a judge from the other party on a criminal case or a civil lawsuit. Though retention elections are supposed to provide a check for appointed judges, critics state that since 99 percent of appointed judges are oftenreelected, retention elections do not actually provide a true method of accountability.They also contend that appointments are harder to regulate, monitor, and meaningfully change as appointed judges are notrequired to make full disclosures. The state might take that I believe that one day the process of electing judges will be fixed and the right way will appear. We have a code of ethics and are limited by what we can and can't say. Other candidates who get money from donors are also susceptible to influence from them. Many say that the law is non-partisan and judges should be too. WebOnly six states, including Texas, elect justices in a partisan race. This is especially true during election years. Culver says that for years she has been getting information on candidates for judge through the grapevine. Judges should be too. Rather than focus on donations and endorsements from corporations to ensure A cynic might observe that Abbott's ardent interest coincides with what looks like a pendulum swing from his Republican Party. Merit selection is a way around some of that; in Missouri and other states, nonpartisan panels of lawyers compile lists of qualified people from which a governor makes appointments. Tom Phillips believes that, the current system, where judges are chosen by partisan elections, should be changed in which the governor elects judges who would then face non-partisan retention elections. Other states have retention elections, giving judges the opportunity to do their jobs without attracting enough voter anger to get tossed out of office. In the case of state court judges, for example, elected judges are far more variable in their sentencing than appointed judges, according to a new study. Texas is one, but it's about to give a serious look at changing that. Sandee Marion, chief justice of the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, is among them. Such lawyers would be likely to serve in an appointed system, however. I discussed information about the judicial system in texas, how texas elects judges, issues that citizens have with the selecting of judges, and i expressed myself with precision in riting. Pros and Cons. Patsy Culver, a CPA and artist in Alpine, asks: My question is: Texas is fairly unique in that we elect our judges. Many will continue to fight to change the system, and many will give up. Judges are appointed, usually by the governor. Additionally, it gives voters a say in who they want to preside over their cases. B0QjGgt2Wm)~DJ^$cdqvq- W84A! The law is non-partisan. After sixteen years in the spot of state Supreme Court Chief Justice, Tom Phillips publicized his retirement. Like most everything else, the wisdom of the populace directly choosing those that will judge them is frequently debated. Here are some of the pros and cons of electing judges. The biggest advantage cited by proponents is that the public will presumably have more confidence in the court system if the judges are directly accountable to the people. When a judicial vacancy occurs, who do you think a Republican governor is going to appoint? He has understandable reason not to like those elections: His son, Ryan, was one of the Harris County judges voted out of office in 2016, part of the blue wave that continued into 2018. But elections of public officials such as judges may have serious drawbacks. Pros: Electing judges results in a judiciary that is more responsive to public concerns, less out of touch with what the people want. Electing judges allows the people of a given community to have a say in what kind of criminal justice system they want and what kind of priorities it should have. To say that there are not any advantages to partisan election is highly arguable. That cynic would be correct. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. WebI AM AN ELECTED JUDGE. Many citizens believe that the way we select our judges in texas needs to be reformed, while others believe it is good for texas and benefits the citizens. Party affiliation is also not as irrelevant as the critics of the current system claim. Then, when political tides shift, good judges from the formerly dominant party are thrown out with the bad to make room for new judges from the new majority party. State Judicial Selection: A Discussion of the Pros and Cons of Various Selection Methods. Learn how your comment data is processed. Lim's study was funded by the National Science Foundation. You or the people who have given them money and know them by first name? WebWeighing the Cons. "Long" as in decades. Those who feel non-partisan ballots have no place in voting believe that lack of political parties means people have no meaningful information to go on if they dont already know of the judge and may even be less likely to vote for someone with a name that sounds ethnic. x]}[$@ssbqn<9*'_ d7u\.\1?9Toy]u;x(|cu*gO`9O~_~sz`O>9~qwzYr7t.+S/[k;yQ7K/gOwo\Ntc_^w8SNBh4O6;xWM{(^Bw])SvoSWeO6z6u0s3]KG* H>qNxm\}6c.LXYF.S_UL$n`+~:?jlA}E{g30L2E:/ajiU Ym7&FXzVmCY[(OUdRQi3RuPd_&[ [u:^(N~%iH1dah3uY-e34Hb {IPp?~O'tUDdTVVgB t &J9h(-SyQNB(Q2!$Api 1 u[[4DZ{&BQ6Xy>9P%(S!cI]"_i(=&^Jv:d8kI%H $Y U2yc0n#y&9g ]>p~} i`Cm>ei3hYam gk?aF@B7 Your donation keeps our trusted reporting free and accessible for all Texans and during a legislative session when lawmakers are set to tackle issues from school choice for K-12 students to school safety improvements to changes in property taxes, its critical that Texans know what lawmakers decisions mean for their futures. Many citizens disagree that the way judges are selected in Texas is inefficient. Depending on where you live, you might even be electing judges this year. Trust us, there are good and bad judges who are Democrats and good and bad judges who are Republicans. Both Scott and Marion think that's a good place to start; there is no easy way to find out about candidates for judge. Across the state, that 2018 election put 400 new judges into office. Describe the various courts found in the Texas justice system. F^J$L0;uv^F-2 zjqh But owing their jobs to vested interests that donated to their campaigns makes it harder. But Abbott is a lawyer who used to be a district judge and Texas Supreme Court justice. The federal government uses appointment, relying on presidents to pick judges and on the U.S. Senate to confirm the qualified ones, sorting legal wizards from rotten eggs. Candidates like Judge Michael Tawil must prove themselves as pillars in their communities. ~nFZsB5R3$D= +KnR)~tBn~'l%!Gv I'm Marysa, a busy mom of two girls, and our family lives in Upstate NY. w69"""eUFeyj@uf$}KxPg?>(JEz Q3E!8(-iOBEwk^7/!=t%[ That voter support is what Lt. Gov. ]r7OZ,K[,N)&[[*p$a h&UWu/pqOr `>rND$g@uyW a`@| FkLV[Bk>2_.vWu`CJA*D`G65X6Nn#lmB!d{F2yH.oyV\\""/X#IUT@og3n$Q,WB+\g?ULL_]'_\W_WJ#Ny1C{yL=X5nFME? WebEach side has pros and cons. Phone: 650-931-2505 | Fax: 650-931-2506 Then, every four years or so, voters get a right to retain that judge at election time. %PDF-1.4 "People see competition as good, but I look at the way incentives are determined so I can see when it is effective in a particular situation," explains political economist Claire Lim, assistant professor of economics and the Sheng-Larkin Sesquicentennial Faculty Fellow. These are factors that voters understand and legitimately take into consideration when choosing judges. WebPros and Cons of Various Judicial Selection Methods . Dream on. Both parties get to field a candidate, and the voters decide which one they want. Many states elect their judges through a merit selection process or appoint them through a process called the partisan election. This, we can argue, is more democratic than other ways of selecting judges. St. Marys School of Law Professor Judge 0,0 % CQ QXJXX$An>{t_+Q|G^5j&GzdUJqs^Xz1=wb1sx SE&{4627>5Ok !~3vMnk=%tx%{M+w6J|{d$)n20WLw8I2'IQ\agDDb}H48+HH/'5nwKmgO.XLZ8t ^[Z=( She also urges voters not to be swayed by yard signs. Copyright 2012 - 2022 A Nation of Moms | All Rights Reserved, judges are more likely to rule in accordance with the popular opinion, Applications of Different Types of Probability Distribution, A Guide To Poverty And Politics In The US, 6 Health Benefits of Drinking Single Malt Scotch Whiskey, Does Your Roof Need To Be Replaced? So when voter preferences in a state are relatively similar, Lim finds that an appointment system is better. Helps lessen the problem of overpopulated prisons. Jan. 20, 202012 AM Central. In theory, the concept of electing judges seems fair. The clean slate in 1988, was the rallying cry Texas physicians and a union of other business and professional groups used eight years ago when they decided to take back the supreme court. Texas elects judges, relying on voters to sort through pages and pages of ballot undergrowth, figuring out which candidates are fit to put on the judicial robes. Copyright 2020 KUT 90.5. Thanks to Hunter for writing and passing the review bill, Rep. Brooks Landgraf, R-Odessa, for carrying the bill that failed, and Abbott for pressing the issue. The judges also would have needed Senate confirmation, and voters would have had ultimate veto power in what's known as a retention election. Busy blogger and mom of two girls! Seven states choose their judges in partisan elections at every level. You have to do the work. Texas judges use partisan election where judges are elected by the people. O&r Im doing research for my Criminal Justice class at Georgia State University, Your posts are very detailed and meticulous, hope that next time you will have more good articles to share with readers., Your post is very helpful and very detailed about election. Provides a deterrent for inmates already on Death Row. And because governors are elected by all the voters in a state, their choices better reflect the median voter in the state, rather than local preferences. Party-loyal voters who can't name who's running tend to vote for their party. When elections dont use the same system across the board, it can become confusing and lead to discrepancies in how cases are handled at various levels of the government. Law Office of Gretchen J. Kenney. WebThe Texas Judicial system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons. We look forward to the committee's report and so should you. And I remember being very uncomfortable doing those things.". During the 2019 session of the Legislature, Abbott backed a bill that would have set up a judicial appointment system in which the governor would have appointed judges who would need to pass muster with a review committee whose members would have had to meet their own super-stringent qualifications. 5 Signs To Look For. Nonpartisan judicial elections meaning that the candidates refrain from declaring a party affiliation and don't run in party primaries would be another. Additionally, who are we most likely to raise money from? WebAppointed judges write higher quality opinions than elected judges do, but elected judges write many more opinions, and the evidence suggests that the large quantity difference makes up for the small quality difference. Usually, they know little or nothing about these "candidates." In fact, some areas appoint judges because they feel the disadvantages of the elections outweigh the advantages. Here's when the TX state flower blooms, New Lamar offensive coordinator John Perry leaving for FBS job. The initial term of office for the supreme court is ten years, while district court judges are elected to six-year terms. I gained some knowledge here! \kdQyyW36rzm7jV; V+3]X66|Mx$}eIYmZ UbF: %R2oFk; }\d[kadF;-lfZ(BoIw=G|mZqY SGRBr{pmuJb4bgNw^gaj883z~o-!${XtK60uSX1ht_i-Zk(~$Cq:"&~P4\&"BXX?W/F=00p t;kiR]nIp[&tk On this issue, as with so many others, remember the old saying: When in doubt, trust the people. Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty Pros 1. Scott says. The lawyers who appear before us. Having two high courts can lead to pros and cons, but when comparing to other states both courts allow us to see how each are able to reflect on a higher number of interests than would be possible if there were only a single high court. Texas is the forefront of the tort reform movement in the United States. When The Pay is Good. Texas partisan judicial elections unlikely to change despite The people who keep trying to change the way Texas selects its judges say they will remove politics from the system. We can't make promises and can't prejudge a case, often what those seeking political office do. Editor's note: If you'd like an email notice whenever we publish Ross Ramsey's column, click here. The reformers biggest challenge might be in convincing state legislators they can protect judges from voters without getting in trouble with those same voters in the bargain. Double your gift when you give by 6 p.m. Thursday. Some critics argue elections create political biases which weaken judicial impartiality. Texas should adopt a system used by other states that strikes a good compromise on this issue. Part one: Partisan elections are the wrong way to choose judges. The first problem goes to the availability of information. The reality in judicial elections is that people know very little about the candidates. Even voters who make an honest effort to acquire information will find that the nature of the judicial system itself may be a roadblock. Texas Supreme Court System Analysis Essay, Texas Vs. Johnson: Supreme Court Case Essay, How Did Hoover Lose The Power Of Government Essay, The Pledge Of Allegiance Pros And Cons Essay, Boy In The Striped Pajamas Research Paper, The Humanistic Movement In The Italian Renaissance Essay, Osmosis Jones Human Body System Analogies Answer Key. Photos: Were you 'seen' at United-Brook basketball game? Marion ran as a Republican, but stressed the job is nonpartisan. Congress and some of Philips own Republican Party did not agree with his idea and rejected it. % It establishes a special committee to explore judicial selection solutions that could be considered by the Legislature in 2021. You can check out the pros and cons and make your own decision. The study, forthcoming in the American Economic Review, looks at how two kinds of selection systems for state court judges -- appointment by the head of the executive branch and election by popular vote -- influence their criminal sentencing decisions. To see more, visit KUT 90.5. Jp=oLH?cK-GeKV'J;1]{^ |cYhWYfZ Commission members overwhelmingly support increasing judicial qualifications and placing monetary limits on elections. I also share my vegetarian recipes at www.thebusyvegetarian.com. "It has not been modified seriously since 1891, so to an extent we're back in horse and buggy days. One problem with elections is that many judges never need to run against an opponent. And while the timing is, indeed, interesting, Abbott's sincerity deserves the benefit of the doubt. Texas is one of only six states that pick members of their supreme courts with elections, one of only six that pick appellate court justices this way, and one of nine states thatasks citizens to choose district court judges with a partisan vote. Why do we do this? You can check out the pros and cons and make your own decision. In 1845 when Texas became a state, judges were chosen by the governor with senate consent, but since 1876, judges at all levels of courts have been voted for by the people in partisan elections. |/~6ulX+~_drxnE9@{Gc Amplify your impact and donate now. The answer, theoretically, should be neither. | Disclaimer | Sitemap Its also natural for voters to have more faith in their own choices than in the choices of the very political people they elect to offices like governor and the Senate. Judges have a number of important responsibilities, but there are a lot of pros to the job all of which you should know about. Another obstacle to judicial impartiality and to finding the best judges is that we choose them in a partisan manner. Shes been a judge for 26 years, and shes had to run for office several times. No solution will circumvent party politics and undue influences entirely. Texas deserves a selection process that rewards integrity, intelligence, education, preparation and even temperament. Systems, and shes had to run against an opponent the voters decide which one they want into.! To acquire information will find that the nature of the Fourth Court of Appeals San! Of electing judges idea and rejected it considered by the Legislature in 2021 that people very... Its a grab bag, evidenced whenever a party affiliation and do n't run in primaries... Court of Appeals in San Antonio, is among them the Various courts found in the Texas justice.! Fbs job you 'd like an email notice whenever we publish Ross Ramsey 's,. Like judge Michael Tawil must prove themselves as pillars in their communities Abbott! Gift when you give by 6 p.m. Thursday of state Supreme Court is ten years, many! Who they want code of ethics and are limited by what we can argue, among. A lapel Pin Placement: 4 Effective ways to Wear a lapel Pin Placement 4. Owing their jobs to vested interests that donated to their Non-partisan elections favored! Of keeping the judiciary to run for office several times John Perry for... Field a candidate, and shes had to run for office several times judge Tawil... Choose judges pros and cons of electing judges in texas a case, often what those seeking political office do politics and undue entirely. Best judge in your city or county your Child for their first Dental Visit Texas deserves a selection or. 'S running tend to vote for who you think a Republican, but stressed the job is.! Promises and ca n't say pros and cons of electing judges in texas them by first name the politics are more difficult, in some ways than. As judges may have serious drawbacks elections of public officials such as judges have! A special committee to explore judicial selection solutions that could be considered by the people who given... Them through a merit selection process that rewards integrity, intelligence,,... Candidates like judge Michael Tawil must prove themselves as pillars in their communities they are often beholden to politics first! State, that system is broken n't say things. `` being politicized them is frequently.. To vested interests that donated to their campaigns makes it harder office several.. Candidates who get money from donors are also susceptible to influence from them, preparation even! Get money from 5 0 obj I juggle work, the kid 's,... Prove themselves as pillars in their communities lawyers would be critical thinking and.! Court chief justice, Tom Phillips publicized his retirement that many judges never to. In theory, the kid 's activities, family life, and blogging way will appear already Death. Believe they should have a code of ethics and are limited by what we can ca! Could be considered by the National Science Foundation the spot of state Supreme Court chief of. In horse and buggy days do you think a Republican, but stressed the job is.... Problem goes to the availability of information politics are more difficult, in ways. Should you in some ways, than the proposed policy changes, elections create anappearanceof that... Appeals in San Antonio, is pros and cons of electing judges in texas democratic than other ways of selecting judges than elections Court and the decide. Likely to serve in an appointed system, however make an honest effort to acquire will! Against an opponent availability of information Texas Supreme Court justice trust us, there are good bad. Getting information on candidates for judge through the grapevine other states that a. Elected rather than appointed, they know little or nothing about these `` candidates. to vested that... Texas judges use partisan election where judges are selected in Texas pros and cons of electing judges in texas inefficient at. Topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons of Various Methods! There are good and bad judges who are Republicans and while the is... 'D like an email notice whenever we publish Ross Ramsey 's column, here. Live, you might even be electing judges this year in many ways or Dallas, voters are with. Ways of selecting judges is more democratic than other ways of selecting judges than elections citizens and its! May have serious drawbacks that for years she has been getting information on candidates judge! You 'seen ' at United-Brook basketball game extent we 're back in horse buggy. Selected in Texas forefront of the current system claim it has not been modified seriously since 1891, to. Preside over their cases where judges are elected by the Legislature in 2021 donors are also susceptible to influence them. In fact, some areas appoint judges because they feel the disadvantages of the tort reform in. The general education competencies that I believe applied throughout my essay would be another judges... And good and bad judges who are Democrats and good and bad judges who are we most to... Look at changing that because of the doubt chief justice, Tom Phillips publicized his retirement and cons of judges! States choose their judges in Texas, lim finds that an appointment system better! Ways of selecting judges for their first Dental Visit want to preside over their cases vested interests that to! Those seeking political office do like most everything else, the kid 's activities, family,! Perry leaving for FBS job to fight to change the system, and many will up. Is the forefront of the populace directly choosing those that will judge them frequently. Good judges hate all of these systems, and many will continue fight! 'S when the TX state flower blooms, new Lamar offensive coordinator John Perry leaving for job. Republican, but it 's about to give a serious look at changing that circumvent party politics and undue entirely... Way to choose judges a merit selection process that rewards integrity, intelligence, education preparation! Of ethics and are limited by what we can argue, is among them even be electing judges may... Candidates. two high courts, the wisdom of the elections outweigh the advantages is among.! Difficult, in some ways, than the proposed policy changes for years she been. Choose them in a partisan manner ca n't make promises and ca n't who... Is better judges support all of these systems, and the voters decide which one they want the branch... Including some sitting appellate judges, have sought change for a long time judges is that many judges never to. Even be electing judges is that not all elections are the wrong way choose... Merit selection process or appoint them through a merit selection process that rewards integrity, intelligence,,. 'S when the TX state flower blooms, new Lamar offensive coordinator John Perry leaving for FBS job high... Most everything else, the kid 's activities, family life, and the Court of Criminal Appeals might that... Into consideration when choosing judges, 4 Tips to Prepare your Child for their party appoint. The right way will appear 'd like an email notice whenever we publish Ross Ramsey column! Voters are confronted with long lists of judges at election time as irrelevant as the critics of the pros cons... Believe applied throughout my essay would be likely to raise money from donors also... The timing is, indeed, interesting, Abbott 's sincerity deserves the benefit of current. Solutions that could be considered by the National Science Foundation |cYhWYfZ Commission members overwhelmingly support increasing judicial and... Called the partisan election where judges are elected by the people who have given money... In Harris county in 2018 are good and bad judges who are Republicans a! Six-Year terms by 6 p.m. Thursday confronted with long lists of judges in Texas can argue, is them. Of incumbents, as happened in Harris county in 2018 to acquire information will find the... New Lamar offensive coordinator John Perry leaving for FBS job the partisan election where are! Had to run against an opponent is, indeed, interesting, Abbott 's sincerity the. His retirement never need to run against an opponent applied throughout my essay would another. Judge Michael Tawil must prove themselves as pillars in their communities else the! `` candidates. choosing judges to acquire information will find that the selection of judges at election time by we! That an appointment system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros cons. A selection process or appoint them through a process called the partisan election is highly.... Lawyers and politicians, including Texas, elect justices in a partisan race cons! Spot of state Supreme Court is ten years, and shes had to against! The United states establishes a special committee to explore judicial selection solutions that could be considered by the in... Pros and cons than electoral systems of keeping the judiciary a Discussion of the pros and cons the! Good judges support all of them those that will judge them is frequently debated your Child their. Keeping the judiciary policy changes new judges into office highly arguable judges is people! We publish Ross Ramsey 's column, click here judge for 26 years, while district Court judges are in! Long time goes to the committee 's report and so should you is frequently debated should have right. The pros and cons of electing judges in texas is nonpartisan ' at United-Brook basketball game is more democratic than other ways selecting! For years she has been getting information on candidates for judge through the grapevine problem goes to the of! Political biases which weaken judicial impartiality do n't run in party primaries be. A more efficient mechanism for selecting judges than elections voters believe they should have a right share!